Instalab
logoInstalab

Fractionated Free Metanephrines

Blood Test
The clearest blood test for catching a rare adrenaline-producing tumor behind unexplained blood pressure spikes, before it does lasting harm.
4.9 (2,194 reviews)
Tested by Quest Diagnostics
Physician-reviewed results
Results in under 1 week
How it works
Order from Instalab
No prescription or your own doctor's order needed
Get blood drawn
At home or at 2,000+ patient service centers
Get results
Explained with clear next steps, no medical jargon

Should you take a Fractionated Free Metanephrines test?

This test is most useful if any of these apply to you.

Told You Have an Adrenal Mass
A growth turned up on a scan and you want to know whether it makes stress hormones before deciding what comes next.
Battling Blood Pressure That Won't Settle
Your blood pressure resists medication or spikes with headaches, sweating and a racing heart, and you want the hidden cause ruled in or out.
Carrying a Family Tumor Syndrome
An inherited condition in your family raises the odds of these tumors, and you want early, sensitive screening on your own terms.
Watching After a Past Tumor
You have had one of these tumors removed and want reliable long-term monitoring to catch any return early.

About Fractionated Free Metanephrines

Some of the most dramatic blood pressure problems trace back to a tumor most people will never hear of. These growths pump out fight-or-flight hormones on their own schedule, triggering pounding headaches, drenching sweats, a racing heart, and blood pressure that shrugs off medication. This panel is the way to find them early.

The catch is that these tumors release their hormones in bursts, so the hormones themselves can read normal between episodes. This panel measures the steady breakdown products instead, which the tumor leaks around the clock. That is why major guidelines make it the first test to run.

What This Panel Reveals

This panel answers one question: is your body carrying a tumor that overproduces stress hormones? The tumors in question are rare growths of the adrenal glands and nerve clusters (called pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas). They flood the bloodstream with adrenaline-family chemicals, and the body converts those chemicals into stable leftovers that this panel can measure.

The value comes from splitting the signal in two. One marker tracks the leftover of adrenaline (called metanephrine). The other tracks the leftover of noradrenaline (called normetanephrine). A third value simply adds the two together to show the total load. Measuring them separately does something a single combined number cannot: it shows which hormone pathway the tumor favors, which in turn hints at where the tumor sits and how it is wired.

The reason this beats measuring the hormones directly is timing. The tumor produces these breakdown products continuously, so they do not fade between symptom spells the way the parent hormones do. In a prospective study of 2,056 people, this plasma approach detected tumors with 97.9% sensitivity at 94.2% specificity, outperforming urine-based testing in higher-risk patients.

How to Read Your Results Together

The pattern between the two markers, not just whether one is high, carries the meaning. Use these combinations as a starting map.

Result PatternWhat It Suggests
Normetanephrine high, metanephrine normalA noradrenaline-producing tumor. Common pattern, often a tumor outside the adrenal gland or tied to certain inherited types.
Both elevated, with a clear metanephrine riseAn adrenaline-producing tumor, which points strongly toward an adrenal gland location.
Either marker more than 3 to 4 times above the upper limitRarely a false alarm. A true tumor is very likely and imaging is the next step.
Mild normetanephrine bump onlyThe most common false positive. Sampling conditions and medications should be reviewed before anything else.

Magnitude matters as much as pattern. A value three to four times above the normal ceiling is almost never seen in people without a tumor, while a small single-marker bump usually reflects something other than a tumor. The combined total also tracks with tumor size, so a markedly high sum raises concern more than a borderline one.

What to Do with Your Results

A mild elevation, especially of normetanephrine alone, is not a diagnosis. The right move is to repeat the test drawn lying down after resting, and to review any medications or recent stress that could push the number up. Only after a clean repeat should the result be treated as real.

A large elevation, or both markers rising together, warrants prompt follow-up with an endocrinologist and imaging to locate the tumor. Because these tumors sometimes run in families, a positive result is also a reason to discuss genetic testing. If you have already had one removed, this panel is the backbone of long-term monitoring: guidelines recommend a first check in the weeks to months after surgery to confirm the tumor is gone, then at least yearly for a decade, and lifelong for higher-risk cases, since these tumors can return years later, with reported recurrence rates ranging from roughly 3% to 15% depending on tumor type, size, and whether it is hereditary.

When Results Can Be Misleading

Several factors can raise both markers at once and fake a positive. Blood drawn while seated instead of lying down is a leading cause; one study found outpatient sampling produced 44% higher normetanephrine and a 3.4-fold jump in false positives. Acute illness, stress, poor kidney function, and older age all nudge values upward, and normetanephrine naturally climbs with age.

Medications are the other big confounder. Acetaminophen can interfere with some older lab methods, and antidepressants such as tricyclics and certain newer agents can raise levels through their effect on hormone handling. Because these tumors turn up in only a small share of people tested, often well under 1% when screening is prompted by symptoms alone, false positives outnumber true ones, which is exactly why one abnormal value is a prompt to investigate, not to conclude.

Frequently Asked Questions

References

10 studies
  1. Lenders JW, Duh QY, Eisenhofer G, Gimenez-roqueplo AP, Grebe SK, Murad MH, Naruse M, Pacak K, Young WFThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism2014
  2. Eisenhofer G, Pamporaki C, Lenders JWMEndocrine Reviews2023
  3. Eisenhofer G, Prejbisz a, Peitzsch M, Pamporaki C, Masjkur J, Rogowski-lehmann N, Langton K, Tsourdi E, Peczkowska M, Fliedner S, Deutschbein T, Megerle F, Timmers HJLM, Sinnott R, Beuschlein F, Fassnacht M, Januszewicz a, Lenders JWMClinical Chemistry2018
  4. Eisenhofer G, Lenders JW, Goldstein DS, Mannelli M, Csako G, Walther MM, Brouwers FM, Pacak KClinical Chemistry2005