Instalab
logoInstalab

OmegaCheck®

Blood Test
See how much heart-protective fat is actually in your blood, not just how much fish you think you eat.
4.9 (2,119 reviews)
Tested by Quest or Access Medical
Physician-reviewed results
Results in 8 business days
How it works
Order from Instalab
No prescription or your own doctor's order needed
Get blood drawn
At home or at 2,000+ patient service centers · 8-hour fast required
Get results
Explained with clear next steps, no medical jargon

Should you take a OmegaCheck® test?

This test is most useful if any of these apply to you.

Watching Your Heart Health
You want a sharper read on your heart risk than a cholesterol number gives, including the protective fats it never measures.
Rarely Eating Fish
You eat little oily fish or follow a plant-based diet and want to know if your marine omega-3 levels are running low.
Taking Omega-3 Supplements
You take fish oil or algae capsules and want proof they are actually raising the fats in your blood.
Healthy but Staying Ahead
You feel well and want to catch and correct an unfavorable fat balance before it shapes your long-term risk.

8 biomarkers included

About OmegaCheck®

Two people can take the same fish oil capsule every morning and end up with very different levels of protective fats in their blood. Diet questionnaires cannot tell them apart, and a standard cholesterol test never looks. This panel measures the actual fats circulating in your bloodstream, so you see what your body absorbed and built into its cells.

The fats measured here sit at the center of how inflammation, clotting, and heart disease develop. Higher blood levels of the marine fats from fish track with lower rates of heart disease and death in large population studies, and the balance between competing fat families adds risk information that cholesterol numbers miss.

What This Panel Reveals

Your body carries two families of polyunsaturated fats that behave differently. The omega-3 family, especially the marine fats found in oily fish, tends to calm inflammation and may help steady heart rhythm. The omega-6 family is the raw material for both inflammatory and protective signals. This panel measures both families and the ratios between them, which is where the story becomes useful.

The core of the panel is your marine omega-3 status. The OmegaCheck value sums the three marine fats, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and docosapentaenoic acid (DPA), as a percentage of all the fat in your blood. Each is then reported on its own, because they are not interchangeable and each carries its own link to heart risk.

The panel also measures two omega-6 fats: linoleic acid, the main omega-6 in most diets, and arachidonic acid (AA), which the body builds from it. Despite a long-standing belief that omega-6 fats are inflammatory, higher blood linoleic acid consistently tracks with lower heart disease and diabetes risk in humans, while arachidonic acid appears mostly neutral rather than harmful in observational studies.

Two ratios turn these numbers into a measure of balance. The omega-6 to omega-3 ratio reflects the overall tilt of your fat intake and metabolism. The arachidonic acid to EPA ratio (AA:EPA) reflects the balance between fats that feed inflammatory signals and fats that feed calming ones. Because these fats compete for the same enzymes, the same EPA level can mean different things depending on what sits beside it.

How to Read Your Results Together

No single number here tells the whole story. The value comes from reading the marine omega-3 total, the individual fats, and the ratios as one picture.

PatternWhat It Suggests
Low marine omega-3 total, high omega-6:omega-3 ratioThe classic low-fish pattern. More oily fish or a marine omega-3 supplement is the most direct lever.
Marine omega-3 rising, but AA:EPA still highIntake is climbing but inflammatory balance has not caught up. Often means a higher dose or more time is needed.
Healthy marine omega-3 total, high linoleic acidA generally favorable pattern, since higher linoleic acid tracks with lower cardiovascular risk in population data.
Low marine omega-3 with high triglycerides on a lipid panelTwo independent signals pointing the same way, since marine omega-3 both raises this reading and lowers triglycerides.

Most of the risk research uses the Omega-3 Index framework, where a red blood cell level below 4% marks the highest-risk group and above 8% the lowest. This panel uses a whole-blood measure, so those exact cutoffs are not directly interchangeable, though the direction is the same: higher marine omega-3 is better. Standardized interpretation frameworks for whole-blood panels are still evolving, so read your result as a trend to improve rather than a fixed pass or fail.

What to Do with Your Results

If your marine omega-3 is low, the fix is usually direct: more oily fish such as salmon or sardines, or a marine omega-3 supplement, then a retest to confirm it worked. Blood levels rise within a few weeks and keep climbing for up to three to four months, so retesting 8 to 12 weeks after a change shows whether your dose is enough.

Pair this panel with the rest of your cardiovascular picture. A lipid panel, ApoB (a count of harmful cholesterol particles), and hs-CRP (a marker of inflammation) cover things this panel does not measure. If your marine omega-3 stays stubbornly low despite supplementing, dose or absorption is usually the issue, and a clinician can help you adjust.

When Results Can Be Misleading

Because all these fats come from one blood draw, a few things shift the whole panel at once. A recent large fish meal or a fish oil capsule taken that morning can temporarily nudge your blood levels up, though the effect on a whole-blood measure like this one is smaller than it would be on a plasma-only test, since the fats stored inside blood cells change slowly. Age, sex, and body weight also shape baseline levels, with higher body weight generally linked to lower omega-3. For the steadiest read, keep your fish and supplement routine consistent in the days before testing.

Frequently Asked Questions

References

8 studies
  1. Matti Marklund, Jason H. Y. Wu, Fumiaki Imamura, Liana C. Del Gobbo, Dariush MozaffarianCirculation2019
  2. Jason H. Y. Wu, Matti Marklund, Fumiaki Imamura, Nathan Tintle, Dariush MozaffarianThe Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology2017
  3. William S. Harris, Nathan L. Tintle, Mark R. Etherton, Ramachandran S. VasanJournal of Clinical Lipidology2018