Finasteride selectively inhibits the type II 5-alpha reductase isoenzyme, reducing DHT by approximately 70%. Dutasteride, in contrast, inhibits both type I and type II isoenzymes, leading to a more robust suppression of serum DHT, up to 90%. This dual inhibition is thought to underlie the differences in clinical efficacy observed between the two drugs.
Multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have compared dutasteride and finasteride in the treatment of BPH. Evidence suggests that both drugs significantly reduce prostate volume, improve urinary symptoms, and lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels.
A large network meta-analysis of 21 studies involving over 29,000 patients found that dutasteride provided a modest but statistically significant greater improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) compared to finasteride, though differences in urinary flow rate (Qmax) and prostate volume reduction were not significant. Similarly, a 2022 meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials (n = 2,116) reported that dutasteride produced a small but significant improvement in Qmax compared to finasteride, with no differences in PSA reduction, quality of life scores, or adverse events.
Other trials have echoed these findings, noting that dutasteride may relieve obstructive symptoms slightly earlier than finasteride when combined with an alpha-blocker such as tamsulosin. However, overall efficacy differences remain small, and both drugs are considered effective first-line agents for BPH.
The debate becomes more striking when comparing dutasteride and finasteride in male pattern baldness. Dutasteride’s stronger DHT suppression translates into superior outcomes in terms of hair regrowth and prevention of follicular miniaturization.
A 2019 systematic review and meta-analysis including 576 participants found that dutasteride produced significantly greater improvements in total hair count and global photographic assessments than finasteride, while showing no significant differences in adverse events such as erectile dysfunction or reduced libido. Likewise, a randomized controlled trial with 917 men demonstrated that dutasteride 0.5 mg significantly outperformed finasteride 1 mg in increasing hair count and thickness over 24 weeks, with comparable tolerability.
Further supporting these results, more recent reviews conclude that dutasteride is more potent than finasteride for both male and female AGA, without evidence of higher risk for adverse effects.
A critical concern with 5-ARIs is their sexual side effect profile, including erectile dysfunction, decreased libido, and ejaculatory disorders. Meta-analyses and large cohort studies consistently show no significant difference in the incidence of these adverse events between dutasteride and finasteride. Concerns about persistent post-finasteride syndrome remain controversial, as long-term studies have not demonstrated consistent differences across 5-ARIs.
Both drugs reduce PSA levels by approximately 50%, which may complicate prostate cancer screening. Furthermore, large trials such as PCPT for finasteride and REDUCE for dutasteride have reported reductions in low-grade prostate cancer incidence but raised concerns about an increased detection of high-grade tumors. However, these findings are debated and may be confounded by detection bias.
The choice between dutasteride vs finasteride largely depends on the indication. For BPH, both drugs are effective and safe, with only minor differences in efficacy. For androgenetic alopecia, however, dutasteride consistently outperforms finasteride in promoting hair regrowth and halting progression, without increasing adverse events. Safety profiles are similar, with sexual dysfunction risks being the most notable shared concern.
In clinical practice, finasteride remains more commonly prescribed due to its longer history, regulatory approvals, and lower cost. However, for patients prioritizing maximal efficacy in hair regrowth or symptom relief, dutasteride may offer a superior alternative.