Loading...
First, a quick refresher on what you're actually measuring. A1C (also called HbA1c or glycated hemoglobin) is hemoglobin in your red blood cells that has glucose attached to it. Since red blood cells live about 100 to 120 days, your A1C reflects your average blood sugar over the past 8 to 12 weeks, with more weight on the most recent 4 to 8 weeks. It's reported as a percentage (like 6.5%) or in mmol/mol units.
Here's why doctors care so much about this number: A1C strongly correlates with your risk of diabetes complications, both small-vessel problems (like eye and kidney damage) and large-vessel problems (like heart attacks and strokes). The higher your average blood sugar runs, the more glucose sticks to your hemoglobin, and the higher your risk.
If you don't have diabetes, the research shows a clear "sweet spot" for lowest risk.
A meta-analysis pooling 74 studies found the lowest mortality risk at an A1C around 5.0% to 6.0%. Once you cross above 6.0%, mortality risk starts climbing. At 6.5% or higher (the diagnostic threshold for diabetes), the risk becomes notably elevated.
Interestingly, A1C levels below 5.0% also showed higher mortality in this analysis. This may reflect underlying health issues rather than blood sugar being "too controlled," but it's a reminder that your A1C exists in the context of your overall health.
For people with diabetes, the danger zones are different, and the research supports a wider acceptable range.
The same large meta-analysis found that adults with diabetes had the lowest mortality risk when A1C stayed between roughly 6.0% and 8.0%. Risk increased at levels above 8.0%, and climbed especially steeply above 9.0%.
A large cohort study of older adults with diabetes found that complications rise steadily once A1C exceeds 6.0%, but the combined risk of complications or death increases most clearly at 8.0% or higher.
In practical terms: a chronically elevated A1C of 8% to 9% or above puts you at significantly higher risk for cardiovascular events, kidney disease, amputations, and death. That's the zone where aggressive intervention becomes critical.
Yes, and this is where the research gets nuanced.
For certain groups, very tight blood sugar control can backfire. The meta-analysis found that in people with diabetes, A1C below about 5.8% to 6.0% was linked to higher mortality and cardiovascular events in several cohorts. This effect was especially pronounced in older or higher-risk patients.
Why would low A1C be dangerous? Aggressive blood sugar control often requires intensive medication regimens that increase the risk of hypoglycemia (dangerously low blood sugar episodes), which can trigger falls, heart problems, and cognitive issues, especially in older adults.
Absolutely. Your age, kidney function, and heart health all shift what's considered dangerous.
If you have severe chronic kidney disease plus diabetes: Research found that both A1C below 5.8% and above 7.2% were associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. The safe zone is narrower than for healthier individuals.
If you're 60 or older with diabetes: A cohort study found complications increased starting above 6.0%, but mortality increased at both very low and very high A1C levels. Tight control in this group may cause more harm than benefit.
If you have existing coronary artery disease plus diabetes: Cardiovascular events increased at A1C levels of 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) or higher.
These findings support what diabetes guidelines increasingly emphasize: A1C targets should be individualized. A 45-year-old with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and no complications might reasonably aim for 6.5% or below. An 80-year-old with heart disease and kidney problems might be safer with a target around 7.5% to 8.0%.
If your A1C is in the danger zone, you probably want to bring it down fast. The good news from the research: meaningful improvements can happen within weeks, and rapid drops don't appear to cause problems for most people.
Structured programs show A1C reductions of about 0.4% as early as one month. By three months, lifestyle or medication changes typically produce drops of 0.5% to 1.0%. Over six to twelve months, reductions of 0.5% to 1.5% are realistic with sustained effort.
One concern doctors sometimes raise is whether rapid A1C reduction might worsen diabetic eye disease. However, real-world population data found that rapid HbA1c reductions of more than 1.5% to 2% over six to twelve months did not increase retinopathy progression in people with mild to moderate existing eye disease.
That said, anyone making dramatic changes should stay in close contact with their healthcare team.
The research points to several actionable conclusions.
For most adults with diabetes, keeping A1C below 8% is a reasonable safety threshold to avoid the highest-risk zone. Staying between 6.5% and 7.5% represents the target many data sets support for typical adults, though higher targets (up to 8% or so) may be appropriate for older adults or those with serious health conditions.
Be cautious about pushing too low. If you have kidney disease, heart disease, or are over 60, an A1C below 6% may actually increase your risk. The "lower is always better" mindset doesn't match what the research shows.
Work with your clinician to set a personalized target. Your age, how long you've had diabetes, what medications you're taking, and what other health conditions you have all matter. A1C is a tool for reducing your overall risk of complications, not a number to optimize in isolation.