Instalab
logoInstalab

Mycotoxins

Urine Test
See whether your body is carrying recent traces of mold and food-borne fungal toxins that no symptom checklist can confirm on its own.
4.8 (4,147 reviews)
Tested by Mosaic Diagnostics
Physician-reviewed results
Results in under 1 week
How it works
Order from Instalab
No prescription or your own doctor's order needed
Self-collect at home
Kit shipped directly to you
Get results
Explained with clear next steps, no medical jargon

Should you take a Mycotoxins test?

This test is most useful if any of these apply to you.

Living in a Damp or Moldy Space
You have water damage or visible mold at home or work and want to see whether related toxins show up in your body.
Chasing Unexplained Symptoms
You have persistent fatigue or brain fog after suspected mold exposure and want an exposure signal to investigate with a clinician.
Curious About Your Diet
You want to understand how much fungal toxin exposure may come from your grains, coffee, nuts, and stored foods.
Tracking Environmental Exposure
You watch your surroundings closely and want to monitor fungal toxin exposure over time rather than guess at it.

11 biomarkers included

About Mycotoxins

Molds leave chemical traces. When you eat grain, coffee, nuts, or dried fruit, or spend time in a damp building, small amounts of fungal toxins can enter your body and leave through your urine.

This panel measures eleven of those toxins in a single urine sample. It is used mainly in research and functional medicine settings to estimate recent fungal toxin exposure. It is not a diagnosis of any illness, because standardized clinical thresholds for these markers do not yet exist.

What This Panel Reveals

Fungal toxins, called mycotoxins, are poisons made by molds. Humans are rarely exposed to just one. Real-world studies almost always find several at once, which is the core reason this test looks at eleven markers together rather than one. In one southern Italy study, every one of the 52 volunteers had at least two different mycotoxins in their urine.

Most of these markers describe exposure through food. Aflatoxin, measured here as aflatoxin M1 (a breakdown product the body forms after eating contaminated grains, nuts, or dairy), is the food toxin with the clearest human cancer link. Ochratoxin A, citrinin, zearalenone, and enniatin B are typical of molds that grow on cereals and other stored crops. Together these paint a picture of what has passed through your diet recently.

A second group of markers is produced by molds that grow in damp indoor spaces. Gliotoxin comes from a common indoor Aspergillus mold, while roridin E and verrucarin A come from Stachybotrys, the mold that grows on water-damaged, paper-rich building materials, and chaetoglobosin A comes from another damp-loving indoor fungus. People hope these will confirm a mold problem at home or work, but that link is not established. These toxins have been measured in building dust and materials, not validated as urine markers of indoor exposure. Medical toxicology groups, including the American College of Medical Toxicology, caution that diet is the dominant source of human mycotoxin exposure and that finding these toxins in urine cannot be attributed to breathing them indoors.

The catch is that some markers sit in both worlds. Ochratoxin A and citrinin can come from either food or indoor mold, so on their own they cannot tell you which source you are dealing with. The value of the panel is in the overall pattern, not any single number.

How to Read Your Results Together

Because this panel is exploratory, read it as an exposure signature rather than a score. A few broad patterns are worth recognizing in your own results.

PatternWhat It May Suggest
Mainly aflatoxin M1, zearalenone, enniatin B presentPoints toward diet as the likely source, since these are classic food-crop toxins.
Gliotoxin, roridin E, or verrucarin A presentThese toxins come from indoor molds, but their detection in urine is not a validated marker of indoor exposure, and dietary sources cannot be ruled out.
Only ochratoxin A or citrinin detectedNot source-specific. These appear commonly from ordinary food and cannot alone confirm indoor mold.
Several markers across both groupsA mixed exposure signal, which is the most common real-world finding rather than a red flag.

Detection also does not equal disease. Sensitive lab methods find low levels of these toxins in the urine of healthy people, and a study of German children and adults detected a citrinin marker in essentially every sample. A positive result tells you exposure happened, not that it is harming you.

When Results Can Be Misleading

Several factors move most of these markers at the same time, which is why a single panel is a snapshot rather than a verdict. Urine reflects recent intake, so what you ate in the days before the test shapes the result. Hydration matters too, which is why labs adjust values for urine concentration.

Levels also swing widely from day to day. In a European validation study that sampled the same people on two separate occasions, urinary mycotoxin measurements agreed poorly between the two collections, so the same toxins often were not detected both times. A one-time result can miss exposure that was there last week, or catch a toxin that was only passing through.

What to Do with Your Results

Treat this panel as a starting point for a conversation, not an answer. Major guideline bodies do not endorse urine mycotoxin panels to diagnose mold-related illness, and there is no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved version of this test. The American College of Medical Toxicology specifically states that finding these toxins in urine cannot be attributed to indoor mold inhalation, so results carry less weight than an established clinical panel.

If food-type markers dominate, the practical response is dietary: examine grains, coffee, nuts, and dried fruit, and how they are stored. If markers linked to indoor molds show up, remember that urine cannot confirm an indoor source; still, inspecting your home or workplace for moisture and mold is a reasonable step, since fixing any source matters more than the number. Because two toxins in this panel are linked in human research to the liver (aflatoxin) and the kidneys (ochratoxin A), companion blood tests of liver and kidney function can add helpful context.

Serial testing has not been validated as a clinically useful strategy for this panel. Because levels bounce around from day to day, no single draw is definitive, but repeating the test cannot reliably pin exposure to a source either. Interpret meaningful results with a licensed clinician or toxicology specialist who can weigh your symptoms, exposure history, and other explanations.

Frequently Asked Questions

References

8 studies
  1. Julia Hurraß, Dennis Nowak, Birger Heinzow, Marcus Joest, Jannik Stemler, Gerhard a. WiesmüllerDeutsches ÄRzteblatt International2024
  2. Els Heyndrickx, Isabelle Sioen, Bart Huybrechts, Alfons Callebaut, Stefaan De Henauw, Sarah De SaegerEnvironment International2015
  3. Karl De Ruyck, Inge Huybrechts, Shupeng Yang, Davide Arcella, Liesel Claeys, Souheila Abbeddou, Willem De Keyzer, Jeanne De Vries, Marga Ocké, Jiří Ruprich, Marthe De Boevre, Sarah De SaegerEnvironment International2020