Instalab
logoInstalab

Enterococcus Faecalis

Stool Test
Spot whether a common gut bacterium has tipped into overgrowth, a pattern tied to inflammation, dysbiosis, and colon disease.
4.8 (2,799 reviews)
Physician-reviewed results
Results in under 1 week
How it works
Order from Instalab
No prescription or your own doctor's order needed
Self-collect at home
Easy self-collection kit
Get results
Explained with clear next steps, no medical jargon

Should you take a Enterococcus Faecalis test?

This test is most useful if any of these apply to you.

Living With IBD
If you have Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis, this count rises with active inflammation and can complement calprotectin in tracking flares.
Just Finished Antibiotics
If you recently completed a course of antibiotics or chemotherapy, this shows whether your gut bacteria are settling back to balance or staying dysbiotic.
Family History of Colon Cancer
If colorectal cancer runs in your family, this adds a microbiome signal to your prevention toolkit alongside standard screening tests.
Tracking Your Gut Microbiome
If you are using diet, probiotics, or lifestyle changes to optimize gut health, this lets you see whether your microbial balance is actually moving.

About Enterococcus Faecalis

Most stool tests look for bugs you should not have in your gut. This one measures a bacterium you always have, but in a quantity that tells you whether your gut ecosystem is in balance.

E. faecalis (Enterococcus faecalis) is a normal resident of the human intestine. The reason to pay attention to its count is that overgrowth, not mere presence, is what consistently shows up in people with colorectal cancer, active Crohn disease, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and microbiome disruption from antibiotics or hospitalization.

What This Bacterium Is And What Stool PCR Measures

E. faecalis is a tough, oxygen-tolerant bacterium that lives in the mouth and gut of most healthy people. In a balanced microbiome it is typically described as subdominant, making up only a small fraction of the overall bacterial community. It earns its reputation as a pathobiont (a normal resident that can turn problematic) when it expands beyond that small share.

Stool PCR measures bacterial DNA directly from a stool sample, usually by amplifying a species-specific gene. Some labs report a relative abundance score, others a copy number per gram of stool. What you are reading is bacterial load, not symptoms, and not whether the organism is actively causing harm.

This is a research-grade measurement. There are no universally agreed-upon clinical cutpoints separating normal from abnormal. Most published evidence comes from case-control studies comparing patient groups, not from large healthy-population reference ranges. That makes a single reading useful as a starting point but never as a standalone diagnosis.

Colorectal Cancer Signal

Stool E. faecalis is often higher in people with colorectal cancer than in healthy controls. In a 650-person case-control study, the count was about 2.2 times higher in people with colorectal cancer than in healthy people. A smaller study found the average copy number in cancer cases was roughly 12 times higher than in healthy controls, with people who had polyps falling in between. That said, when researchers pool many shotgun metagenomic studies together, E. faecalis is not among the most consistently CRC-enriched fecal species (those tend to be organisms like Fusobacterium nucleatum, Parvimonas micra, and Peptostreptococcus stomatis), so the fecal signal for E. faecalis specifically is less replicated than the tissue-based signal.

Who Was StudiedWhat Was ComparedWhat They Found
650 adults with and without colorectal cancerStool E. faecalis count by qPCRAbout 2.2 times higher in cancer cases than in healthy controls
People across cancer, polyps, and healthy controlsCopy number per gram of stoolRoughly 12 times higher in cancer than healthy, with polyp counts between the two
Cohort of people with and without colorectal cancerStool qPCR abundance of CRC-enriched bacteriaE. faecalis was more prevalent in cancer cases than controls

What this means for you: a higher count is a signal worth watching, not a cancer diagnosis. Some prospective work suggests fecal E. faecalis levels can be unstable over time and are not always clearly tied to large adenomas or cancer in individuals. The connection at the population level is real, but it does not translate cleanly into individual risk prediction yet. Standard colorectal cancer screening (FIT, Cologuard, or colonoscopy) remains the first line.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease

In Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, stool E. faecalis is consistently higher than in healthy controls. In Crohn disease specifically, higher counts track with disease activity scores and fecal calprotectin, a separate marker of gut inflammation. A study of people with inflammatory bowel disease found a statistically significant positive correlation between high-level E. faecalis colonization and the Crohn Disease Activity Index (R = 0.31, P = 0.01), as well as with fecal calprotectin (P = 0.016).

If you have IBD, a rising E. faecalis count alongside rising calprotectin or symptoms can add weight to the picture of active inflammation. It is not a substitute for established markers like calprotectin, but it can support the trend.

Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis And Liver Disease

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (a chronic disease that scars the bile ducts) shows a particularly strong gut-liver connection. In a 337-person study, people with this condition who had high stool enterococci abundance had a lower probability of survival without needing a liver transplant. Higher fecal cytolysin, a toxin produced by some E. faecalis strains, was also linked to lower overall survival.

This is one of the clearest cases where the gut bacterium appears to influence an organ outside the intestine. It points to the broader idea that what is happening in your stool can quietly shape what is happening in your liver, joints, and immune system.

Antibiotic And Hospital Expansion

E. faecalis is notorious for blooming after antibiotics that wipe out its competitors. In a large hospital microbiome study, both meropenem and metronidazole exposure were associated with a higher rate of transitioning into an Enterococcus-dominated stool state. An earlier transplant cohort found metronidazole roughly tripled the odds of enterococcal domination. After stem cell transplantation, the share of enterococci in stool jumped from about 21% in people who stayed well to 74% in those with active gut graft-versus-host disease.

Hospitalization, chemotherapy, and severe illness like sepsis also push the count up. Preliminary work (a preprint, not yet peer-reviewed) has suggested that fecal E. faecalis enrichment may be among the stronger microbiome-based predictors of COVID-19 severity. The mechanism is the same in each case: the rest of the microbial community gets knocked down, and this organism takes advantage of the empty space.

A Normal Resident That Becomes A Pathobiont

It can feel contradictory that a normal gut bacterium is also associated with cancer, IBD, and worse survival in liver disease. The framework that resolves this: E. faecalis is not a good-or-bad organism, it is a context-dependent one. At low levels it sits quietly in a balanced ecosystem. When something disrupts the surrounding community (antibiotics, inflammation, a tumor microenvironment, hospitalization), it expands, produces reactive oxygen species and virulence factors like cytolysin and gelatinase, and starts contributing to inflammation and tissue damage. The count, not the presence, is what matters.

When Results Can Be Misleading

Stool PCR is sensitive but not always specific to disease. A single reading can mislead in several ways.

  • Recent antibiotics: courses in the prior weeks to months can transiently bloom E. faecalis without indicating any underlying disease. Most healthy adults recover species richness within about 2 months of stopping antibiotics, though some taxonomic and resistance-gene changes can persist for 6 to 12 months.
  • Hospitalization or acute illness: sepsis, chemotherapy, and stem cell transplant routinely push enterococci up. A reading taken during or shortly after these events reflects the stress, not your baseline.
  • Healthy carriage: in surveys of healthy people, stool pathogen panels often return positive results without symptoms. A detectable signal does not equal infection, especially in adults without GI complaints.
  • Sample handling and DNA extraction: stool contains substances that interfere with PCR. The accuracy of quantification depends on the lab's extraction method, so values from different labs are not directly comparable.

Tracking Your Trend

A single E. faecalis count is hard to interpret on its own. The number gains meaning when you compare it to your own prior readings and to the rest of your microbiome panel. If you are healthy and curious about your gut, a baseline plus a follow-up in 3 to 6 months gives you something to compare. If you have IBD, recurring digestive symptoms, or a known colorectal cancer risk, annual or twice-yearly tracking alongside calprotectin and other microbiome markers makes the signal usable.

Retest after any major intervention that could shift the microbiome: a course of antibiotics, a new probiotic or prebiotic regimen, a significant diet change, or a hospital stay. Wait at least 4 to 6 weeks after antibiotics before retesting so you are reading your settled state, not the acute aftermath.

What An Abnormal Result Should Prompt

An elevated E. faecalis count by itself is not a diagnosis and does not justify treatment with antibiotics. Antibiotics often make enterococcal overgrowth worse, not better. Instead, treat it as a prompt to look at the broader picture.

  • Look at companion markers: elevated fecal calprotectin alongside high E. faecalis points toward active inflammation and warrants a GI workup. Low microbial diversity, expansion of other pathobionts, or loss of butyrate producers strengthens the dysbiosis picture.
  • Review recent exposures: if antibiotics, hospitalization, or major illness occurred in the past few months, that likely explains the bloom and a repeat test after recovery is the right next step.
  • Consider GI specialty input: persistent elevations alongside symptoms (bloody stools, unexplained weight loss, abdominal pain, family history of colorectal cancer or IBD) warrant a conversation with a gastroenterologist about colonoscopy, calprotectin trending, or imaging.
  • Do not skip standard screening: if you are over 45 or have a family history, FIT or colonoscopy remains the appropriate cancer screening, regardless of what your stool microbiome shows.

What Moves This Biomarker

Evidence-backed interventions that affect your Enterococcus Faecalis level

↑ Increase
Take meropenem or other carbapenem antibiotics
Carbapenem antibiotics like meropenem wipe out competing gut bacteria and let E. faecalis bloom. In a hospital cohort tracking stool microbiomes over time, meropenem exposure was associated with a higher rate of transitioning into an Enterococcus-dominated stool state. This expansion is the kind of overgrowth tied to worse outcomes in transplant and IBD patients, so the rise is undesirable even though the antibiotic is treating something else.
MedicationStrong Evidence
↑ Increase
Take metronidazole
Metronidazole was associated with a higher rate of transitioning into an Enterococcus-high stool state in the same hospital cohort, and an earlier transplant cohort found it roughly tripled the odds of enterococcal domination. The drug knocks down anaerobes that normally compete with E. faecalis, leaving more room for it to expand. The bloom can persist after the course ends and reflects collateral microbiome damage rather than benefit.
MedicationStrong Evidence
↑ Increase
Undergo allogeneic stem cell transplantation
After stem cell transplantation, the proportion of enterococci in stool jumped from about 21% in patients who stayed well to 74% in those with active gut graft-versus-host disease. PCR confirmed E. faecium or mixed E. faecium and E. faecalis predominance. The dominance is a marker of microbiome collapse, not a treatable cause, and tracks closely with transplant complications.
Medical_procedureStrong Evidence
↑ Increase
Take cytotoxic chemotherapy
Chemotherapy shifted gut microbiota from balanced communities toward states with lower diversity, increased E. faecalis abundance, and decreased butyrate-producing bacteria, alongside lower fecal butyrate. The shift reflects collateral damage to the microbial community and is linked to neutropenic enterocolitis risk.
MedicationStrong Evidence
↑ Increase
Take beta-lactam antibiotics
Treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics was associated with an increased relative abundance of Enterococcus in stool after treatment in clinical studies. E. faecalis has intrinsic resistance to cephalosporins and relative resistance to many other beta-lactams, so killing off susceptible competitors gives it room to grow. The expansion sets up the kind of dysbiosis linked to inflammation and infection risk.
MedicationModerate Evidence
↑ Increase
Take opioid pain medications
In hospital microbiome data, opioid exposures including fentanyl and hydromorphone were associated with a higher rate of shifting into an Enterococcus-high stool state. Animal studies of morphine show similar expansion of E. faecalis. Opioids slow gut motility and shift the local gut environment in ways that appear to favor enterococcal expansion. This matters most for people on chronic opioid therapy.
MedicationModerate Evidence

Frequently Asked Questions

References

14 studies
  1. D'asheesh TA, Hussen B, Al-marzoqi a, Ghasemian aJournal of Gastrointestinal Cancer2020
  2. Zrelli M, Ferjani a, Nouira M, Hammami S, Ghithia N, Mouelhi L, Debbeche R, Raoult D, Boutiba Ben Boubaker IDiscover Oncology2024
  3. Geravand M, Fallah P, Yaghoobi MH, Soleimanifar F, Farid M, Zinatizadeh N, Yaslianifard SArquivos De Gastroenterologia2019
  4. Holler E, Butzhammer P, Schmid K, Hundsrucker C, Koestler J, Peter K, Zhu W, Sporrer D, Hehlgans T, Kreutz MBiology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation2014