Instalab
logoInstalab

Haemophilus influenzae

Vaginal Swab Test
Get an early read on an uncommon vaginal bacterium tied to persistent irritation and serious pregnancy infections.
4.8 (2,583 reviews)
Tested by US Biotek Laboratories
Physician-reviewed results
How it works
Order from Instalab
No prescription or your own doctor's order needed
Self-collect at home
Kit shipped directly to you
Get results
Explained with clear next steps, no medical jargon

Should you take a Haemophilus influenzae test?

This test is most useful if any of these apply to you.

Curious What's in Your Vaginal Microbiome
Learn whether an uncommon vaginal bacterium is present. Most healthy carriers have no symptoms or linked harm.
Dealing With Discharge That Returns
If symptoms keep coming back after yeast treatment, this can point to a bacterial cause that needs a different fix.
Pregnant or Trying to Conceive
Routine strep screening usually misses this bacterium, which is tied to serious infections in pregnancy and newborns.
Caring for a Girl With Irritation
In young girls this bacterium is a leading cause of vaginal infection that often gets mistaken for yeast.

About Haemophilus influenzae

Finding H. influenzae (Haemophilus influenzae) on a vaginal swab is uncommon, and that rarity is the reason a positive result is worth understanding. In young girls it's one of the leading bacterial causes of vaginal infection. In pregnancy, the same species can reach the womb and the newborn, where invasive infection is linked to miscarriage, preterm birth, and sepsis.

This is an exploratory measurement. There's no standardized cutoff for how much is too much, and in the one study of non-pregnant women, those who carried it in the vagina had no linked symptoms. So a single result is a reason to look closer, especially if you're pregnant, planning to be, or dealing with discharge that won't clear.

What This Bacterium Is

H. influenzae is a bacterium whose usual home is the nose and throat. Carriage studies, most of them in children, find that about one in five carry it there at any given time (21.8% to 24.3% across studies), with carriage peaking around ages 4 to 5. Adults carry it less often. The name comes from an old mistake, when it was wrongly blamed for flu. The flu is caused by a virus, and this is a bacterium.

Strains come in two broad kinds. Some wrap themselves in a sugar coat, and the best known coated strain, type b, is the one the childhood Hib (type b) vaccine targets. Strains without a coat are called nontypeable. They now cause most invasive disease, including the cases tied to pregnancy and newborns.

Your result is reported in units of 100,000 colony-forming units per milliliter. A colony-forming unit is a way of counting bacteria as if each one could grow into a colony on a lab plate. Depending on how a lab measures it, the number can come from growing the bacteria or from estimating the amount of their DNA, and those approaches don't give interchangeable numbers. The research behind this marker mostly asks whether the bacterium is present at all, and no study has set a level that separates harmless carriage from infection.

One case report describes invasive infection in a person taking a psoriasis drug that blocks interleukin-17, a signaling molecule that helps defend mucous membranes. A single case can't show the drug caused the infection, but the authors raised the possibility that these drugs make invasive infection easier.

How Often It Turns Up

Vaginal carriage is rare in healthy women and appears more often in pregnancies that are already in trouble.

Who Was StudiedWhat Was ComparedWhat They Found
Non-pregnant women of reproductive age (315 samples)Bacterial DNA in vaginal fluidAbout 4 in 100 carried it (4.4%), with no link to age, background, or a common vaginal bacterial imbalance
Pregnant women at routine late-pregnancy screening (300 women)Culture and DNA testing of vaginal-rectal swabs1 of 300 by culture (0.3%) and 0 of 100 by DNA testing
Pregnant women whose waters broke early, before labor and before termVaginal cultureAbout 7 in 100 carried it (7.3%), in older data

Sources: Limaye et al. (row 1); Bui et al. (row 2); earlier data cited by Collins et al. (row 3).

What this means for you: a positive result puts you in a small minority. If you feel fine and aren't pregnant, that's no cause for alarm, though it's the kind of uncommon finding that deserves a second look if you're pregnant, since the highest rate here came from complicated pregnancies.

Vaginal Infection in Girls

The clearest link between this bacterium and vaginal symptoms comes from children. In young girls it ranks second only to group A strep as a bacterial cause of vaginal infection, which shows up as irritation and a pus-like discharge.

The strains involved are coatless, and in one series of 32 girls more than half (57%) belonged to a single subtype. Symptoms often come back. In the same research, many girls had first been treated for yeast, even though yeast infection is much less common before puberty, and antifungal creams can't clear a bacterial infection.

If your daughter has discharge or irritation that keeps returning after yeast treatment, a swab that looks for bacteria, including this one, is the more useful next step. A positive result points toward a targeted antibiotic chosen by her pediatrician.

Vaginal Symptoms in Adult Women

In adults the picture is less certain. In a general-practice study of 286 women who had high vaginal swabs, heavy growth of this bacterium appeared alongside symptoms of vaginal infection, but the link was weaker than for group A, C, and G streptococci, and the study couldn't show the bacterium was causing the symptoms.

That fits the carriage data, where women who tested positive didn't differ from those who tested negative on any measured symptom or characteristic. If you have symptoms and this is the main abnormal finding on your panel, it's a reasonable suspect. If you feel fine, it may simply be passing through.

Pregnancy Loss and Preterm Birth

Pregnancy is where this bacterium matters most, and the strongest data come from invasive infection. Here, invasive means the bacterium has reached the blood, the placenta, or the fluid around the baby. Those studies didn't measure vaginal swabs, so they describe what happens once infection spreads and can't say how often a positive swab leads there.

In England and Wales, pregnant women were about 17 times as likely as non-pregnant women to develop invasive infection with coatless strains (17.2-fold). When infection struck before 24 weeks, almost every pregnancy was lost (93.6%). Later in pregnancy, about 3 in 10 babies were born early (28.6%) and about 1 in 14 was stillborn (7.1%).

A New Zealand review of 54 cases found infection inside the womb in two-thirds of them (66.7%). Across the 48 pregnancies with known outcomes, nearly all (93.8%) ended in fetal loss, preterm birth, or a newborn needing intensive or special care. Case reports add infection of the placental membranes, the placenta tearing away from the womb wall, and maternal blood infection.

These numbers can seem to clash with the carriage data, where a few percent of healthy women carry the bacterium with no apparent effect. Both hold because carriage and invasion are different events. Most carriage seems to go nowhere, a small share of infections probably climb from the vagina into the womb, and pregnancy makes invasive infection far more likely. A positive swab marks a possible starting point, and it doesn't mean that climb is happening.

If you're pregnant and test positive, tell your obstetric team. The authors of one newborn sepsis case series advise that finding this bacterium on a maternal vaginal or placental swab be reported promptly, with targeted antibiotic coverage if infection of the membranes or an unexplained fever develops.

Newborn Sepsis

Doctors call a serious bloodstream infection in a baby's first days early-onset sepsis. Cases caused by coatless strains often appear within 48 hours or the first week of life, which points to the baby picking up the bacterium around birth. U.S. surveillance counts pregnant and postpartum women and newborns among the groups hardest hit by invasive disease from these strains.

The route isn't fully settled. One six-year hospital review found seven newborn sepsis cases, with the bacterium recovered most often from the baby's airway and then from blood or spinal fluid. A separate study screened 300 pregnant women and found one carrier, so maternal vaginal carriage doesn't fully explain how babies get infected.

Research on vaginal bacteria in high-risk pregnancies points the same way for the broader group this species belongs to. Bacteria of that type (called Gram-negative) were linked to more newborn infection and intensive-care admission than other vaginal bacteria, though those studies didn't single out H. influenzae.

Why a Single Reading Can Fool You

  • Lab method: in lab tests with known amounts of the bacterium, the broth used for routine group B strep screening recovered it from only 2.4% of samples, while direct plating on a nutrient-rich gel recovered it every time. Culture-based and DNA-based counts also aren't interchangeable, so results from different labs or methods can't be compared directly.
  • Routine pregnancy screening: the standard late-pregnancy swab is built to find group B strep and usually misses this bacterium, so a normal result on that screen tells you nothing about it.
  • Where infection hides: a negative vaginal swab doesn't rule out infection of the placenta, blood, or baby, because some maternal and newborn cases were found only in those sites.
  • Panel false alarms: on one broad DNA panel run on spinal fluid, about 78 of every 100 positives for this species (77.8%) were judged likely false positives. That's a different specimen, but it's a reason to confirm an unexpected positive.

Tracking Your Trend

One swab is a snapshot. How long vaginal carriage lasts, and whether it persists into pregnancy, hasn't been worked out, so a repeat test is the only way to tell a passing finding from a persistent one.

No study has set a retesting schedule. If your result is positive, a repeat swab a few months later, or a few weeks after finishing any treatment, shows whether it cleared. If you're planning a pregnancy, a test before you conceive and again early in pregnancy gives your obstetric team a current result. Without symptoms or pregnancy plans, there's no evidence that routine repeat testing helps.

A trend also tells you whether treatment worked. If you took antibiotics for symptoms linked to this bacterium, a negative follow-up swab is the confirmation you're looking for, and a repeat positive is a reason to ask for susceptibility testing.

What to Do With an Unexpected Result

  • Positive, no symptoms, not pregnant: retest in a few months and check the rest of your panel for a broader imbalance. Carriage alone hasn't been linked to symptoms or harm in this group.
  • Positive with discharge, irritation, or odor: see a gynecologist or primary care clinician for a culture with susceptibility testing, which shows which antibiotics the strain responds to. Defaulting to antifungal treatment is the mistake the research flags most often.
  • Positive and pregnant or trying: share the result with your obstetrician or a maternal-fetal medicine specialist. Fever, abdominal pain, or leaking fluid during pregnancy needs same-day care whatever your swab showed.
  • Recurrent or invasive infection, or taking immune-suppressing drugs: bring in an infectious disease specialist to guide testing and treatment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Panels containing Haemophilus influenzae

Haemophilus influenzae is included in these pre-built panels.

References

16 studies
  1. Tina I. Bui, Carol E. Muenks, M. Wallace, Benjamin Reimler, C. Burnham, M. YarbroughEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases2024
  2. M. Limaye, S. Brubaker, Tara M. Randis, a. RatnerBMC Microbiology2023
  3. Jessica R. Howard-anderson, S. Satola, M. CollinsOpen Forum Infectious Diseases2018
  4. Mugahid Ibrahim, Qasim Mahmood, M. Zia, Iqtadar Hussein, Khorshed Khalifa, N. O'connellArchives of Disease in Childhood2019